11-16-2010, 02:29 PM
|
#21
|
Epic Scholar
thatperson is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: In bed with Skred
Posts: 4,704
|
it works on a case by case basis
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
There are modifiers that alter drop chance when you go AFK based on what you do when gone. We will list them here: - Fix and eat a sandwich +15%
- Watch TV -5%
- Urinate +20%
- Finish your homework +10%
- Stand on your head for 5+ minutes +33%
We believe these are working as intended.
|
|
|
|
11-16-2010, 02:37 PM
|
#22
|
Guest
|
When were you hired by Glitchless, TP?
|
|
|
11-16-2010, 02:46 PM
|
#23
|
Epic Scholar
flipynifty is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,529
|
we didn't hire TP....
rofl i'm kidding maybe he is one of them!
__________________
omg i wanna sammich nao
|
|
|
11-16-2010, 02:58 PM
|
#24
|
Guest
|
who cares...Glitch is god here,remember that,the rules r set there to protect u
(stupid users) from yourselfs actually, if Glitch would have to enforce his rules BY THE WORD then the 1st one on the toplist would then have to be banned alongside with 80% of nod
malc u suck and every1 else who actually is in this thread (includin me yes)
stfu and get your wallnuts bigger
|
|
|
11-16-2010, 03:17 PM
|
#25
|
Guest
|
Yeah, you're one to talk, Scammer Neo. Don't go there. You probably would NOT like Glitchless to lay down a definitive rule, because that might affect your ability to screw your friends over.
|
|
|
11-16-2010, 03:19 PM
|
#26
|
Epic Scholar
thatperson is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: In bed with Skred
Posts: 4,704
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malc
When were you hired by Glitchless, TP?
|
as much as i would like to be part of glitchless' staff im not...on the other hand im just stating how hes been taking care of these events....the people who share accounts in game everyone knows it and glitch prolly knows dont get banned while everyone who blantantly says on the forums that they are selling an account or giving it away gets banned simple enough....plus i think those 2 that u said got banned just got civil banned as a warning not permabanned
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
There are modifiers that alter drop chance when you go AFK based on what you do when gone. We will list them here: - Fix and eat a sandwich +15%
- Watch TV -5%
- Urinate +20%
- Finish your homework +10%
- Stand on your head for 5+ minutes +33%
We believe these are working as intended.
|
|
|
|
11-16-2010, 03:27 PM
|
#27
|
Guest
|
Ah, I see sarcasm is not in your repertoire, TP. How about I make it a little clearer for you, and everyone. Stop giving your opinion on what happens, and let Glitchless speak for themselves. I -get- that it's been a case by case basis so far. But I also -get- that it's really not a clear cut rule, and it should be. I don't think Glitchless should ban everyone who has been given an account. I think they should do just the opposite. But I think it needs to be clear. Crystal. Capiche? So, and I'm asking nicely, please shut up. And anyone else who thinks they know the Mind of Glitchless. And let Glitchless speak for Glitchless. How hard -IS- that for you??
|
|
|
11-16-2010, 03:35 PM
|
#28
|
Epic Scholar
thatperson is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: In bed with Skred
Posts: 4,704
|
glitchless has stated before that they wont ban for account sharing
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
There are modifiers that alter drop chance when you go AFK based on what you do when gone. We will list them here: - Fix and eat a sandwich +15%
- Watch TV -5%
- Urinate +20%
- Finish your homework +10%
- Stand on your head for 5+ minutes +33%
We believe these are working as intended.
|
|
|
|
11-16-2010, 03:38 PM
|
#29
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thatperson
glitchless has stated before that they wont ban for account sharing
|
Just can't shut that motor up, can you?
I am aware Glitchless has stated that. Glitchless has also stated the opposite. DOH! So shut up, and let Glitchless clarify which it really is, and how...or whether...all players are going to be treated fairly. That is to say, treated the same.
|
|
|
11-16-2010, 03:44 PM
|
#30
|
Epic Scholar
thatperson is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: In bed with Skred
Posts: 4,704
|
dont post on a f***ing forum if you dont want other peoples opinions
help@nodiatis.com
email glitchless there if you dont want other people to try and help u answer ur f***ing questions dumbass
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
There are modifiers that alter drop chance when you go AFK based on what you do when gone. We will list them here: - Fix and eat a sandwich +15%
- Watch TV -5%
- Urinate +20%
- Finish your homework +10%
- Stand on your head for 5+ minutes +33%
We believe these are working as intended.
|
|
|
|
11-16-2010, 03:55 PM
|
#31
|
Guest
|
Aww, now don't go and get all upset, TP. I've liked you up to now. Now you're starting to demonstrate a lack of intelligence, which I find unsettling. I posted on here in response to "Huggle's" question. Which I am sure is a question for a lot of people who aren't sold on the same old response from people like you who don't realllly think for themselves.
|
|
|
11-16-2010, 03:56 PM
|
#32
|
Epic Scholar
thatperson is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: In bed with Skred
Posts: 4,704
|
glitchless already responded to the OPs question with it is illegal to share accounts
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
There are modifiers that alter drop chance when you go AFK based on what you do when gone. We will list them here: - Fix and eat a sandwich +15%
- Watch TV -5%
- Urinate +20%
- Finish your homework +10%
- Stand on your head for 5+ minutes +33%
We believe these are working as intended.
|
|
|
|
11-16-2010, 04:06 PM
|
#33
|
Guest
|
Man, you are dense, TP. Of course he did. And that opened up a new question from me about "which is it?". And rather than go back through that whole tirade again, since it is obvious you just need to be at the center of attention, I'm going to do something else.
If it is illegal, if it is bannable, etc...then Trojan should be banned. As I said before, I like Trojan. In general at least, and I'm not out to get her banned. However, I am interested in Glitchless either sticking to the policy of banning, or change it. So below, here is Trojan admitting in Chat she is not the original. So now what? You going to give your $.05 worth again, TP and say something that will be obviously repetitive and ignorant? Or are you going to let Glitchless have a say?

|
|
|
11-16-2010, 04:18 PM
|
#34
|
Epic Scholar
thatperson is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: In bed with Skred
Posts: 4,704
|
your too dense to realize that gltichless has already answered all of your questiosn before so im done
it is illegal but they wont hunt you down and ban you for it pretty simple
i posted an email address if you want glitchless' response to anything else without having other player input try emailing rather than posting in a discussion board
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
There are modifiers that alter drop chance when you go AFK based on what you do when gone. We will list them here: - Fix and eat a sandwich +15%
- Watch TV -5%
- Urinate +20%
- Finish your homework +10%
- Stand on your head for 5+ minutes +33%
We believe these are working as intended.
|
|
|
|
11-16-2010, 04:21 PM
|
#35
|
Auction Master
Melusinenyxie is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Near Chicago
Posts: 1,124
|
I kinda find it funny you tell Glitchless to speak their own mind and to keep ourselves out of it but a lot of posts Glitchless quotes the players and agrees that that is the answer. So why don't you keep and open mind and actually read what other players are talking about, because even though we might not know it all, we do understand quite more than you give us credit.
__________________
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
11-16-2010, 04:30 PM
|
#36
|
Guest
|
No Mel, I give you a lot of credit. TP too, in general. But Glitchless has posted contrary statements on this subject, and I would just like to see Glitchless resolve it. Not a player. The rules are clear, the enforcement is not. If you were the enforcer, then I would want you to speak out. But you're not, so I'm asking Glitchless to make it clear. Either people can be given accounts...or they can't. If Glitchless wants to make it a case by case basis, then Glitchless needs to explain how we, as a playerbase, can avoid being on the wrong side. If Glitchless is going to stick to the 'ban ban ban', then I expect to see known, self-admitted sharers banned. If Glitchless wants to change the rule so people can share, then I think that's just dandy.
Why is it so hard for either of you to just see what Glitchless has to say? What interests me most is if Glitchless says nothing at all. Because there is clearly a questionable rule here, that is not being enforced consistently. If Glitchless says nothing, then that says volumes in itself. Which has nothing to do with you and TP saying it's illegal. Because if Trojan's walking around, it's obviously NOT.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
11-16-2010, 05:44 PM
|
#37
|
Epic Scholar
Smashbros is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,174
|
cause malc doesnt understand rules.
it says in the rules not to share accounts to stop people sharing and stealing items, case point: neo and sonera.
if we do share accounts, we wont be hunted down and punished, and no one is yet to be banned for sharing accounts.
if, in the case you pointed out, someone posted in forum that they were selling their acc they WOULD be banned, as they are in essence, selling in game items for real cash, which is against the rules, and 1 of the things that got sele banned.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
However you want to spin it, buddy. This patch was specifically designed to somehow screw you over.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
Tell that to the crybaby archers 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
We are well aware of the over-dramatic reactions to game changes in an effort to skew perception. It doesn't work, just makes them look like cry babies.
|
|
|
|
11-16-2010, 05:55 PM
|
#38
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smashbros
if, in the case you pointed out, someone posted in forum that they were selling their acc they WOULD be banned, as they are in essence, selling in game items for real cash, which is against the rules, and 1 of the things that got sele banned.
|
No, the guy posted they were free for the taking. All you had to do was log on and it was yours. Which is the same thing Trojan or Neo or whomever had to do.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
11-16-2010, 06:21 PM
|
#39
|
Seer's BFF
StormGuardian is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: athens GA
Posts: 744
|
Malc, here's the deal. Sharing accounts(or passwords) is illegal. Done. No more needs to be said, but since you don't understand why...here ya go:
Why is this in place? To prevent people from using/abusing other peoples accounts. To prevent further complaints that might occur from account sharing.
Will Glitch ever explicitly say exactly where the line is? Most likely not, b/c then people will push the line over and over again, and get away with as much as possible, and that line will continue to be pushed until bans start happening. That causes a huge increase in the amount of monitoring Glitch would have to do to make sure that exact boundary was in place.
So, yes, if it's completely obvious, aka, Hey here's my account I don't want it anymore, then yea, it'll be banned...that's a no brainer. If it's subtle and 2 friends sharing it, there's no reason for Glitch to go out of his way to ban the account.
As he's said before, if you're stupid enough to share your password/account, and something happens, it's not his fault, and nothing will be done to restore it. Period. That's the whole point of "no account/password sharing" in the first place. It's to prevent unnecessary crap that he would have to deal with.
If you want to secretly give an account away, go for it, that's your call, but it's still "against the rules." If it's public knowledge, just know it has a chance of being banned.
I should add...why do you even care? Are you gonna give away a toon? If so it's illegal!
Last edited by StormGuardian; 11-16-2010 at 06:24 PM..
|
|
|
11-16-2010, 06:51 PM
|
#40
|
Gem Pouch Expert
Iceblood is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 405
|
Malc, I think it's fairly obvious at this point that team Glitch does not enforce the rules against account sharing until there is some other reason to get rid of a player. I think your demand for answers will leave you wanting.
On another note, I'm not sure why you're attemping to single out one toon when there are many that account share and openly discuss both in game and on these forums. It seems personal and could make your motivations suspect.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 PM Boards live since 05-21-2008 |
|
|
|