Hey Nikita...

Originally Posted by Ehlmaris

Then point to the facts, the real situation. Give me some links to the relevant information. Tell me what post broke the rules, who made the post, and what the punishment was. Tell me who should have, in the interest of consistency, also been punished. Point out specific posts displaying why.

Quit railing on inconsistency unless you're prepared to point to specific evidence to back up your claim. I recall someone saying that we are innocent until proven guilty... while that statement isn't necessarily true as this is the Internet which does not have its own laws in place that determine the nature of innocence/guilt, if it were, it would apply to Nikita too.

Link the evidence, plzkthx.

I already made a thread with links to insulting/offending posts.

It is in the bugs forums under Inactive Mods. Go check it out.

They have yet to been infracted, as an infracted post has a red rectangle at the bottom of the post.

[Jerzy]

Ehl,

No offense, but I doubt anyone gives a damn whether or not you are convinced or even your thoughts. I only made the issue public because private wasn't working...my post is intented for them. I posted it in uncivil because I like to curse (I like pretending I'm a saucy pirate). This isn't creative writing class at the community college or a philosophy discussion with a bunch of bohemian wannabes at the local coffee shop. I'm not really concerned with your "feelings" on the matter.

Again, no offense, but my sole goal is to get admin to weigh in . . .

Originally Posted by Ehlmaris

Then point to the facts, the real situation. Give me some links to the relevant information. Tell me what post broke the rules, who made the post, and what the punishment was. Tell me who should have, in the interest of consistency, also been punished. Point out specific posts displaying why.

Quit railing on inconsistency unless you're prepared to point to specific evidence to back up your claim. I recall someone saying that we are innocent until proven guilty... while that statement isn't necessarily true as this is the Internet which does not have its own laws in place that determine the nature of innocence/guilt, if it were, it would apply to Nikita too.

Link the evidence, plzkthx.

Please read the other links on forums and speak to the people who were actually involved. Jerzy will be a good person to start with, since you are posting in this thread.

This will be my final reply to you. I tire of speaking to an old man in a hood, playing philosopher when what he needs is more education.

Thank you Sherman for pointing to evidence. Ives, you have to keep in mind that with the excessive amount of posts made about how bad Nikita is at doing her job, it's going to be incredibly difficult to find anything with the facts I'm looking for. Searching for posts containing Nikita would result in at least an hour of time being wasted digging through threads trying to find the one that Sherman pointed out.

Also, personal attacks are often only used in argument/debate as a last resort... when one party has run out of things to say to either support his position or disprove the opponent's. If you decide to break your statement of finality in this, please stick to the facts of the argument - don't attack me. I'm just arguing for the sake of argument here. :P Never said I agree 100% with what I'm saying!

anyway i'm gonna go read that thread sherman pointed out, brb

[Jerzy]

Chrissakes Ehl...I'm done with you.

Jeff, take the infraction off. Take it off, close the thread, and let's move one.

P.S. Nikita sounds suspiciously like "Wendy Whiner"...

[Jerzy]

Who do I need to **** to get this infraction taken off? Just point me in the right direction and I will make the sweetest love to them. Or we can delve into the forbidden world of taboos.