blaze breaking arena rules before change

[kingsz]

why is he not banned?

[Kembo]

something should be done here ... specially if the members that are already banned are still banned

[Blaze]

screenie openly proves i was in queue first. "they queued while sox was afk". i didn't say "they were in queue so i queued vs them" js.

[Glitchless]

Originally Posted by kingsz

why is he not banned?

We'd have to ban both teams. But this is exactly why the previous rule was too complicated to properly enforce. Don't want any part in your silly drama.

[Kembo]

so should ban both teams anyways blaze has access to them both LOL

[kingsz]

funny how this is considered drama but all the other teams before this were banned were no issue

should threat all the players in nod the same, if they break a rule they should deal with it.
this is a change of things that did hurt 4-6teams before it was changed all of a sudden....others already took the hit

[Freakymagic]

Dont understand why people who are exploiting keep on getting rules made/changed to allow them a free pass.

Nodiatis, who can exploit and get away with it.

[Tsutsu]

Originally Posted by Freakymagic

Dont understand why people who are exploiting keep on getting rules made/changed to allow them a free pass.

Nodiatis, who can exploit and get away with it.

^

[kingsz]

blaze has the right toonname, all the other before him just didnt have favorism in play...start to feel like this more and more...how can some break the rules non stop while others get banned without doing proper research? the damage was already done when mirci team was banned and only thing glitch does is lowering the false ban?....now there should be a ban and the rules are wtf changedXD.....yup

[Huggles]

This kinda looks like the 11th place team asking for 5th place to be banned. That would make 11th place team top 10.

Hmmm...

[Tsutsu]

Yes

[Wulfrym]

Originally Posted by Glitchless

We'd have to ban both teams. But this is exactly why the previous rule was too complicated to properly enforce. Don't want any part in your silly drama.

Right,
so whenever Glitch feels like it, he makes up a completely new rule?
And explanation being it's silly drama?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Glitchless]

We're not blaming anyone in particular for creating drama. The original rule itself was impossible administer without creating it.
"This guy wasn't really sharing, he just had the same e-mail by mistake."
"This guy wasn't sharing, he just has to use the same iPad cause he's a conjoined twin."
"Why isn't ____ banned from arena? A coconut told me he eats his toenails. What more proof do you need?"

Someone predicted that the original rule was going to create an untenable mess, and they were right. We were wrong. We made plans to remove it and put a suitable replacement in effect as soon as possible.

[NoRemorse]

Originally Posted by Wulfrym

Right,
so whenever Glitch feels like it, he makes up a completely new rule?
And explanation being it's silly drama?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

straight from tou :



MODIFICATION OF THESE TERMS OF USE Glitchless LLC (sole owner/operator of Nodiatis) reserves the right to change the terms, conditions, and notices under which the Glitchless LLC Sites/Services are offered, including but not limited to the charges associated with the use of the Glitchless LLC Sites/Services. You are responsible for regularly reviewing these terms and conditions and additional terms posted on particular websites. Your continued use of the Glitchless LLC Sites/Services constitutes your agreement to all such terms, conditions, and notices.