im inspecting you, not me

[Middington]

Currently, when inspecting people, it shows epic item(and pet) accuracy based on YOUR epicurious. this should be changed to reflect how accurate the person you're inspecting is, not you.

[Deadlyone]

Support!!!

[Hunters Bane]

Indeed

[moblob]

support...i always find it awkward to think about pming the person asking what lvl their epicurious is

[Ayden]

Oh lol - yeah as i read just noticed that's always an annoying thing - and so true.
Support

[Syn]

"Epicurious: Every 25 points in this skill raises the accuracy of all epic items and pets you view or use by 1 rating so that epics with good accuracy will have epic accuracy when this skill is maxed."

try reading the description next time. this allows you to calculate the actual accuracy of the item being viewed. why should it reveal the other person's skill level when you can't inspect any of their other stats or skills?

[Syn]

"Epicurious: Every 25 points in this skill raises the accuracy of all epic items and pets you view or use by 1 rating so that epics with good accuracy will have epic accuracy when this skill is maxed."

try reading the description next time. this allows you to calculate the actual accuracy of the item being viewed. why should it reveal the other person's skill level when you can't inspect any of their other skills?

feel better now?

[Middington]

Originally Posted by Syn

"Epicurious: Every 25 points in this skill raises the accuracy of all epic items and pets you view or use by 1 rating so that epics with good accuracy will have epic accuracy when this skill is maxed."

try reading the description next time. this allows you to calculate the actual accuracy of the item being viewed. why should it reveal the other person's skill level when you can't inspect any of their other stats or skills?

I've read the description, I read it the day it was implemented....cause I was there for that. just who in the **** are you?

if you read my post(which you obviously didn't) I explained what epicurious does, and why it should be changed.

[Syn]

Originally Posted by Middington

I've read the description, I read it the day it was implemented....cause I was there for that. just who in the **** are you?

if you read my post(which you obviously didn't) I explained what epicurious does, and why it should be changed.

according to the description, it's working exactly as designed and planned. like I said before, this allows you to calculate the actual accuracy of the item. you have yet to explain why it should expose or reveal the person your inspecting's skill level in Epicurious. some people might prefer to keep as much information as possible private.

[Middington]

yes, epicurious is working exactly as it is supposed to, I'm not arguing that, you ****ing clown (which will be the 2nd time I've told you that)

my suggestion was that the skill should be MODIFIED

my suggestion got a lot of support from toons who actually have epics, and who use epicurious. you're neither, so now my intent is just to **** with you.

yes, it would be nice to keep it private, which would be great, if your arguement was to nullify inspecting all together. but your arguement is just to keep one part of the inspection process ambiguous.

inspecting people can tell you a great deal about their skills. to be exact: atleast how much protection they have, their petsmanship (and generally wound), their archery skill, their blocking skill (if applicable), their suiting, their weaponry skill..... etc

forum less, play more, you'll learn faster

[Syn]

actually, yes, my argument would be an option to hide all that info, for those of us who really would prefer to keep their info private.

*edit*

and I have epics, and virtues ... on 2 paid accounts ... now what were you saying, toonboi? something about clowns (can somebody get me a knife to cut through all this BS and irony)?

[Middington]

Originally Posted by Syn

actually, yes, my argument would be an option to hide all that info, for those of us who really would prefer to keep their info private.

your suggestion would be dumb, considering that there is already a way to do that.

[Syn]

and this is explained and outlined where exactly?

[Middington]

no where, except in the depths and halls of common ****ing sense.

[Syn]

calling bull ...

*edit*

troll less. people will think you're smarter and less of a troll than you really are ...

[Middington]

trolls don't generally garner large amounts of forum rep.

when forum rep was a feature, I had the 2nd highest, next to glitchless.

also, the people in nod know I'm an ******* and they love me for it. I've received countless PM's of encouragement, from people who wish that I continue to **** with you.

[Syn]

well then I guess it's good to have goals in life and it's good you have community support. you know what they say. "trolls of a feather flock together". as far as ****ing with me though, so far, you're about as significant as a level 1 mob. try getting off the computer and experiencing the real world. I've survived the worst it had to offer. this is just down time for me.

[Middington]

Originally Posted by Syn

well then I guess its good to have goals in life. you know what they say. "trolls of a feather flock together". as far as ****ing with me though, so far, you're about as significant as a level 1 mob. try getting off the computer and experiencing the real world. I've survived the worst it had to offer. this is just down time for me.

i'll be sure to let my boss know that 60 hours a week aint enough

[Rakar]

good man mid, he'll appreciate that

[Huggles]

support