Underpowered/Overpowered?

[Valiumandritalin]

I chose rangers/casters.

Archers have trishot/kiting [which pwns meleers]/all 3 crit. skills.

Casters because if built properly they can be insanely powerful end-game characters, there are loads more spirit zones then combats and melees/archers usually don't have grey magic resistance auras to ward off the magic. Also these 2 classes most commonly have low CNT.

Melees are constant and after the pve/pvp damage balancing they are getting boring (pvp-wise) as well as underpowered end-game characters.

IMO ^^ - feel free to disagree.

[Gwendalyn]

personally my thoughts is melee and range are about the same equivalent ... neither over powers the other. if the builds are right, then they all have their good and bad points

edit* if i knew that you could choose more then 1 at the time.. which i was to hasty to realize, i would have chosen melee AND range, and not all equal =\

[Destruction]

Jeff, could you allow us a second vote on this? I just had a change of mind on my vote and I didn't realize that there was a "select all that apply" option. If not, then it's ok lol

[Faithfulservant]

yeah i didn't realize you could put more than 1 as overpowered


shoulda paid more attention :S

[Sapreaver]

I agree faithful

[Destruction]

Lurkee why did you pick each one as opposed to "all equal"?What the heck

[Valiumandritalin]

.. people, READ, then VOTE.

****.

[Relic]

I did vote for Range classed characters, for a multitude of reasons.

(1) PvP is so dependent on luck with Range, I can duel a level 70 archer with skills MUCH LESS than mine, and be killed by the archer 50% of the time, and win the other 50. On the other hand, i have been dueling the same Melee/DW based characters for months now, and the results are ALWAYS the same, i have more skills therefore i always win.

(2) Range is the only character type in game that has PVP only skills, this is obviously an overpowered feature, and it has been proven many times. A group of 3 archers could take out 6 Melee characters because of the skill Arrow Rain, which has a 0.2% chance per level to strike ALL ENEMYS.

I would never suggest a nerf for ANY class, like so many people here are so quick to do. Rather i would say to buff the weaker classes, like WHIP/PET and MELEE, and bring them up to par with the Archers.

-Relic

[Destruction]

I would never suggest a nerf for ANY class, like so many people here are so quick to do. Rather i would say to buff the weaker classes, like WHIP/PET and MELEE, and bring them up to par with the Archers.

I agree. Buff weaker classes.Whips/Pets being the obvious one at this moment in time.

[Valiumandritalin]

Originally Posted by Destruction

I agree. Buff weaker classes.Whips/Pets being the obvious one at this moment in time.

And melee.

-.-

[Destruction]

And melee.

-.-

That is not clear from this point in the poll.

[Destruction]

Whips/Pets: 5.56%

Like I said, obvious.

[Destruction]

Actually,strike that. That should be 0%. That one person voted for all categories,in basics, voting 'all equal' not 'whip/pets."

Yeah i agree buffing pets and whips from day 1 so idk why Jeff thinks i r only favor melee


/wrists i use healing pets and will never use attack pets DUHHH GOD didnt you read my blog

[Relic]

Originally Posted by Destruction

That is not clear from this point in the poll.

What is clear is that, All classes excluding Archers are in dire need of a buff.
Just buffing WHIP/PET makes no sense at all, then archer AND pet would have advantages over melee. One buff for each class is whats needed, not one single class. No matter which point of view you are looking from, its the only way.

Originally Posted by Relic

(2) Range is the only character type in game that has PVP only skills, this is obviously an overpowered feature, and it has been proven many times. A group of 3 archers could take out 6 Melee characters because of the skill Arrow Rain, which has a 0.2% chance per level to strike ALL ENEMYS.

I would never suggest a nerf for ANY class, like so many people here are so quick to do. Rather i would say to buff the weaker classes, like WHIP/PET and MELEE, and bring them up to par with the Archers.

-Relic

TY, Bump

[Destruction]

What is clear is that, All classes excluding Archers are in dire need of a buff.
Just buffing WHIP/PET makes no sense at all, then archer AND pet would have advantages over melee. One buff for each class is whats needed, not one single class.

I see. My comment was made for 'which ONE class should get it," but I agree with you on the statement that if "multiple" classes get buffs,which ones deserve it. According to this poll, I mean.

No matter which point of view you are looking from, its the only way.

I disagree. If you're looking from the PoV of "which one most deserves it" then it's obvious whip/pets. Key word being most.

I bring up this PoV not to be annoying, but because I, amongst other people I'm sure, read (past tense) this as a "which one deserves to be buffed most," as opposed to a 'multiple' selection.

[Valiumandritalin]

Melee's got nerfed by PvP/PvE damage balancing.

Bring back the pwnage !

[Destruction]

Melee's got nerfed by PvP/PvE damage balancing.

Bring back the pwnage !

Booooo-I like what happened.

[Relic]

You guys sure are PRO at turning a thread into a CrapStorm.
Damnit, i just contributed...